Pas d'allusion au « Précieux Lama » Padmasambhava. Aucune mention non plus de l’influence chinoise sur le Tibet impérial. Un recadrage avec des choix conscients et intentionnels ?
PS Au niveau du samaya en ligne, les photos et les adresses IP des participants et leur stockage dans le Cloud permettent désormais un suivi en ligne transgénérationnel avec un classement de "crédit social" !
***
[1] D’après le livre de Laurence Waddell publié en 1895 « The Buddhism of Tibet: Or Lamaism, with Its Mystic Cults, Symbolism and Mythology ».
[2] « In the more than one thousand years since Shantarakshita brought us the Buddhist tradition, the Nalanda Tradition, we have kept it alive—an invaluable part of humanity’s cultural heritage. Even those who have no interest in religious practice can benefit from the knowledge it preserves. When we first came into exile, people still referred to our tradition as Lamaism. Thurman and Berzin there — gestures to the screen in front of him — know all about that. It was as if all that was important was Lamas and their hats. Now, people are clear that our tradition is the Nalanda Tradition with firm roots in Indian traditions. » Preliminaries for an Avalokiteshvara Empowerment. May 29, 2020
Aucun commentaire:
Enregistrer un commentaire